The Karpman Drama Triangle (Triangulation) is a concept developed by Dr. Stephen Karpman that explains how people engage in behaviors that perpetuate cycles of conflict and tension. This model uses three main points – the persecutor, rescuer, and victim – to describe how people become stuck in destructive patterns of interaction with one another. In this article, we will explore what triangulation is and its characteristics, identify the underlying causes of triangulation and potential consequences, as well as discuss strategies for avoiding it.

A Definition of Triangulation

Triangulation is a concept developed by Dr. Stephen Karpman that identifies the three aspects of relationships that can lead to cycle of conflict and tension. These aspects are the persecutor, rescuer, and victim. The persecutor is the person whose behavior creates tension or negative feelings in the relationship. The rescuer is someone who attempts to alleviated this tension by intervening in the situation. Finally, the victim is the person who experiences this tension as a result of their interaction with either or both of these two other individuals.

Triangulation occurs when all three protagonists interact with each other in a way that perpetuates problematic cycles without any resolution being found. This often results in one person taking on the role of “victim” while another takes on the role of “persecutor”, leading to accusations and blame being thrown back and forth between them. In some cases, another person may attempt to intervene as a “rescuer” but this rarely solves anything because it does not address the core issue at hand. Instead, it only adds fuel to an already tense situation.

Background to the Karpman Drama Triangle

The Karpman Drama Triangle is a social model developed by Stephen Karpman, who was studying under Eric Berne at the time, the pioneer of ‘transactional analysis’.

The background to this psychology-based development lies in WWII. As veterans made their way home to the United States, therapists noticed that some who had been progressing well in treatment whilst still away would suddenly regress once back at home. Researchers began to turn to look at the nature of family relationships and their effects on individuals. Some were found to have a positive benefit, whilst others were found to be very detrimental.

Then in 1966, Murray Bowen, published his influential family systems theory with triangulation being one of its crucial components. This concept suggests that when two members are in disagreement, a third person is called upon to form a triangular relationship which promotes comfort more than direct confrontation would. We use this process of creating triangles on numerous occasions in order to maintain harmonious relationships amongst us all.

In 1968, Stephen Karpman first coined the term “drama triangle”. He didn’t intend to describe a real victim with his model but someone who feels or behaves like one. His paper titled “Fairy Tales and Script Drama Analysis”, which analysed Little Red Riding Hood as its example, was published that same year. After graduating from University, Karpman completed post-graduate studies under Berne. Encouraged by Berne’s work, Karpman published “Karpman’s Triangle” in 1968. Four years later he was rewarded with The Eric Berne Memorial Scientific Award for this groundbreaking paper – a true testament to his models powerful impact and social influence.

In 1968, Karpman first introduced his Drama Triangle Model in a paper to illustrate the dynamic between people in relationships. This simple model provides valuable insight into how we play different roles and interact with one another on a daily basis. With this framework, readers can gain a better understanding of their own behavior and perspective as well as that of others.

Underpinning this Drama Triangle concept are the connections between mature responsibility, the ego need for power, and these two phenomena’s connection to relationship boundaries. Karpman drew on Eric Berne’s Transactional Analysis theory to show how all human beings develop their own unique personal narrative, which contains all our beliefs about who we are, what the world is like and how we relate to it, and how others relate to us. He identified the key roles that we play in these dramas of interaction and placed them into his triangle:

Karpman employed triangles as a representation of manipulative relationship exchanges.The Drama Triangle models the correlation between personal responsibility and power during confrontations, depicting how people shift in self and socially destructive roles throughout a conflict. He outlined three characters; The Persecutor (the upper-hand), Rescuer (the higher status) and Victim (submissive). By positioning these protagonists on an inverted triangle, he referred to them as being the three parts, or aspects of all human relationship-based ‘drama’.

The Three Roles Within The Karpman Triangle

Role 1) The Victim. If a person feels vulnerable, they may be consumed by feelings of being helpless or oppressed. This can lead to a mindset that ‘the world is out to get me’ and result in an inability to make decisions or tackle problems. In such cases, individuals often turn towards other people – seeking their support and protection as rescuers. The Victim in this model is not intended to represent an actual victim, but rather someone who just feels or acts like one.

The victim’s attitude is one of helplessness; they feel persecuted and unable to move forward. Victims remain with their persecutor or find another one to sustain the cycle. Seeking help from rescuers only reinforces these self-defeating emotions as it fails to bring about a change in circumstances. However, at some point, they may well feel let down by their rescuer and move into a persecuting role, turning on their previous rescuer. They will still maintain their victim mindset; however, they may also seek out a persecutor to confirm their identity as a victim.

Role 2) The Rescuer (a.k.a. The Hero). When a Rescuer is present, their cry of “Let me help you!” rings out. It’s typical for the enabler to experience feelings of guilt if they do not save the day and can sometimes shift into Persecutor mode as nothing seems to work in their favor. Unfortunately, this type of rescuing does more harm than good by creating a dependency on others instead allowing people to learn from the repercussions that naturally arise as a result.

Taking on a rescue role drives focus away from oneself. Self-obsessed people can feel proud for coming to another person’s aid. This can also help justify any negative feelings caused by failing in their mission. When rescuers divert their attention onto someone else, they are able to ignore all of their own anxieties. At its core, though, seeking out this type of role is an attempt to dodge personal issues disguised under the guise of caring for someone else’s needs.

Role 3) The Persecutor (a.k.a. The Villain or Bad guy). The Persecutor is the person who won’t take responsibility and will relentlessly blame, criticize, control and overpower. However, when it’s suggested that they are in fact at fault themselves then they may flip into defensive mode or even become a Victim if aggressively challenged by one of their peers. As a result of this response from the Persecutor, Victims can quickly transition to becoming tyrannical as well.

We can all imagine scenarios where these roles are acted out. Imagine, in the workplace, Beth turning late for an important business meeting and Jenny, her manager, starting to reprimand her. Beth takes on the role of a victim and lists all the things that are going wrong for her, including a sick grandmother and a missed bus. Jenny assumes the role of a persecutor and insists there are no excuses; she must be on time. Derrick, another manager, intervenes as the rescuer, giving credence to Beth’s story of missed buses and a sick grandmother.

At this point, roles can now begin to shift; perhaps Jenny could now become the victim as she reacts to Derrick. Derrick always takes Beth’s side; why does no one listen to Jenny? Poor Jenny! Derrick could now begin to reprimand Jenny for her aggressive managerial abilities, or poor people skills, while Beth could turn rescuer and decide to defend poor Jenny’s position. The best way to avoid all of these silly relationship dynamics is to not engage to begin with.

Books relating to Helping People

Non-fiction is a rich tapestry of biographies, educational insights, memoirs, and narratives to captivate the mind. It presents a deep immersion into enlightening historical accounts and insightful discourses. The Helping People section is dedicated to books that inspire empathy and service.

Avoid Engaging in Triangulation to Begin With

Engaging in triangulation can lead to a variety of consequences, both on the surface and beneath the surface. On the surface, it can create an atmosphere that is hostile, tense and full of conflict. People may become defensive and combative as they seek to defend their positions or attack those of others. This creates a negative dynamic within the relationship, and can lead to feelings of resentment and anger that linger long after any particular instance has ended.

Beneath this outward hostility lies a more far-reaching effect: people who engage in triangulation may find themselves unable to reach a resolution because they are stuck in this cycle of conflict and tension. They may become so focused on blaming each other that they begin to lose sight of their ultimate goal – mutual understanding and peace. The longer this situation persists, the more likely it is that feelings will harden and bitterness will set in, making reconciliation increasingly difficult if not impossible. Ultimately, engaging in triangulation can damage relationships beyond repair if it is not addressed quickly and dealt with constructively.

The Drama Triangle is a valuable tool for uncovering what roles we might be playing in our relationships; it encourages self-reflection to understand the actual aim of any triangle dynamic. Typically, the triangle is triggered when someone decides to take on the role of a victim or persecutor and then attempts to draw in additional players. The people recruited for the roles may change their position over time, creating a variety of scenarios. Take, for example, when the victim attacks and takes on a persecutor role while previously being the ‘rescued’. This shift in position creates an entirely new dynamic within this warped framework.

Each participant in this dynamic fulfills their own individual desires, rarely taking the time to recognize how it harms or contributes to dysfunction for everyone involved. It is almost as though each person is prioritizing their self-interest instead of being considerate and compassionate towards others. Furthermore, one can note that any character may appear at first glance like a hapless victim but has the capacity to shift into a controlling Persecutor without warning by claiming “accidental” behavior with eventual apology afterwards.

The rescuer’s true intentions are the most elusive of all. In terms of the triangle, they have a dual or disguised motive which allows them to benefit from playing “the hero”. On one hand, their goal is obviously to help resolve the issue; however there also lies a secret, more insidious aim that ensures that the issue doesn’t get fixed. By rescuing someone, the rescuer may experience a rise in their self-esteem and subsequent respect from others. They may also find joy by having an individual relying on them and believing that they are helping; though, at a deeper level, it could be seen as manipulative behavior to keep receiving rewards.

Codependency between a victim and rescuer can be an all-too-common relationship dynamic, in which the rescuer reinforces their partner’s dependence by creating feelings of inadequacy. That said, victims may benefit from having someone to care for them in this manner too. Surprisingly enough, these relationships often take shape as counselor or therapist-client relationships where there is also financial gain for the rescuer who deliberately, and wrongfully strives to maintain the unwholesome and co-dependent relational connection.

Oftentimes, those who take part in triangulation assume a primary role within the drama triangle (victim, rescuer or persecutor). This habitual stance is typically established during their childhood and continues to define their interactions with others. Even though they mainly inhabit one position on the triangle, participants can switch to all three roles when necessary.

Potential Solutions for Drama-Triangulation

Dealing with triangulated conflict can be approached from a number of angles; the most effective being when all individuals in contention are included. All involved should join forces to discern and talk about what sparked the disagreement. After these reasons have been brought up, everyone must commit to resolving their issues through transparent conversations and sincere discourse. Solutions need to be found that satisfy each person’s requirements while evading fault-finding and defensiveness.

Additionally, it may be advantageous for all involved parties to employ active listening techniques, such as mirroring or repeating back what is heard, so that everyone present feels acknowledged and comprehended. This practice can foster an atmosphere of trust and understanding which will facilitate those involved in working together towards finding a resolution. Moreover, demonstrating respectful behavior is essential to guarantee the process stays constructive and mutual respect is maintained throughout.

Steve Karpman famously stated that each individual in a triangle of drama has the potential to receive satisfaction. Yet, understanding how to stop these parties from obtaining their objective is crucial in defeating this antithesis. Moreover, understanding how one’s underlying motives may be driving them to engage in triangulation is paramount to breaking this unhealthy cycle. This self-awareness encourages an individual to focus on positive communication, honest expression and effective resolution instead of attempting to manipulate another person.

Finally, it can be helpful for all participants to cultivate self-awareness. It‘s wise to remain mindful of the roles that may have been instilled in an individual’s psyche from childhood and how these affect their current interactions today. Overall, triangulated conflict will lead to dysfunction if not managed wisely. However, by employing these discussed strategies and being conscious of everyone’s needs, one has a greater chance at reaching healthier outcomes for all parties involved.